Forum Signatures Have Minor SEO Effect

June 5th, 2010

OK, I think I can say the forum signatures test is now finished.

Two weeks after I removed all the signature links, the Wordpress blog is ranking slightly better than the Blogger blog. Both blogs disappeared from Yahoo.

Just a reminder if you have missed the previous posts:

The experiment started here.

A week later there was no clear winner.

Two weeks later Yahoo was successfully manipulated and ranked the blog with the signature well even without using quotes in the search.

So as a conclusion I can say forum signature link do work in Yahoo and have minor effect in Google.

If you have other kind of results, feel free to share.

Signatures Test – Yahoo “Buys” It

May 15th, 2010

It’s two weeks after starting the forum signatures test. The last week there was no definitive winner, so I listed the Blogger blog in another forum signature.

Google

I think Google dislikes my link building efforts :D Yesterday the Wodrpress blog was far ahead for searching the phrase with quotes. Reminder: it’s the other blog that has the signature links! Both blogs never ranked in the first 20 pages for “building dog houses” without quotes.

Today the Blogger blog can’t be found even for search with quotes.

Yahoo

Yahoo however seems to be easily fooled by my signature links. While the Wordpress blog is not found at all, the Blogger one is now 11th when searching without quotes and second for the search with quotes. Nice, eh.

Next step

Now I am going to disable the signature links one by one and see what will happen.

Update On The Signatures Test

May 8th, 2010

Ok, one week after I started the forum signatures test, the Wordpress blog ranks first for “building dog houses” (with quotes) when checked in Google through Anonymouse.org. The SEOBook RankChecker extension is showing the Blogger blog first.

Both are not found at the first 20 pages for the phrase written without quotes.

So I still have no categorical result. I’ll add the link in another MMO forum where I have 2700 posts and will keep the test for one more week. Let’s see if this will boost the Blogger blog. Lol.

SEO Test: Do Forum Signature Links Matter?

May 1st, 2010

Now I have two blogs that rank almost equally. Today the Wordpress blog ranks a bit better – on 8th page for “building dog houses” (in quotes), while the Blogger blog is on 9th. But they change their places all the time and the rankings are for a keyword with quotes, so it’s really insignificant difference. This is good for the second test.

The test: Do forum signature links improve search rankings?

This will be an easy test. I am a moderator in a make money-related forum and have 3,000 posts. The signature links there are dofollow.

I will just place a link with keyword text “building dog houses” (without quotes) to the Blogger blog in my signature there. Let’s see how much this will improve that blog’s rankings.

I will also perform a sub-test – once this is completed, I will remove the link and see how much the rankings will decrease.

Talk to you soon.

The Great Content That Attract Links and Gets Top Ranking

April 24th, 2010

Unless you are very new to SEO, you know that the most important ranking factor is having inbound links to your site. The more and the higher quality they are, the better chances you have to rank high. And the most efficient way to build high quality inbound links is to have great, exceptional, and remarkable content.

The really big question is how to create such content and what is a great content at all. Most webmasters think they are creating great content but the truth is their content is just average, or at the best case it’s just good. And this is not enough to attract real links.


Being sexy is link magnet too. Veronica Belmont is a good example.
Photo by Lan Bui

Here is the “secret” of the great content. It can be many more things than an article. But let’s start with articles – what kind of them are making a killer content:

Articles

Great content can be a long, well researched, well structured and visually appealing article. Such an article can’t be written for an hour or two – it can take days to plan, research, analyze, collect data and draw the conclusion. It’s like writing a paperwork for the University but it should be easy to read and appealing to the readers. Examples of such articles are many of the pages on Wikipedia (although some of them are too academic and boring). Such articles rarely make it on Digg-like sites, but they acquire quality links slowly over time. The good news is that writing such article does not require much talent or being a genius. It requires just hard work, research, good writing and editing. Being an expert in the field you are writing about helps a lot.

Great content can also be an insightful text that changes people’s lives. Such articles don’t necessarily include any statistical data or research – they are just a result of the author’s experience, erudition and original ideas. Examples of such articles are the best posts of Steve Pavlina or Zen Habits. The bad news is that you really need a talent to create such content.

Sometimes even articles that are not long and deep can be great content and attract links. Such genius little pieces are many of Seth Godin’s posts. Well, you need to be a genius to write like him all the time, but everyone can produce a genius piece once in a while.

Articles that are very funny or shocking can also make great content and attract lots of links but in most cases their success is limited in time compared to the others. This is the kind of content that makes it on Digg and other social bookmarking sites.

Finally, large and useful resource lists and checklists also often score as great content. The key here is that the lists must be really vast and complete, containing links to other resources, and be really useful. Some crappy “101 methods to make money online” in most cases doesn’t make great content unless you really present 101 doable, well explained, realistic and working methods. Here is an example of a great checklist that gained a lot of links and keeps doing it (regardless I disagree with some items).

Just don’t forget one thing when you are trying to build links with articles. They should be interesting to enough people that would eventually link to them. A research about the recent corncrake’s population in Florida maybe will not make it.

Collections and Resources

Sometimes the great content isn’t intended directly for the end user. It can be some easily searchable/sortable or organized collection of data or resources on some topic that could help other webmasters, writers and so on to complete their work. For example years ago even publishing a HTML code for a drop down with all countries was a linkbait content. Nowadays you will need to work harder, but the idea remains the same – helping others to do their work by providing easy to use data. It may require some programming work and software or hardware resources but can be a very powerful tool for attracting links.

This type of content requires no genius, just a lot of research and hard work, and of course being able to pick what type of data exactly to organize and offer.

Images and Videos

Images can be very powerful for attracting links and often work even better than text. One of the reasons is that while almost everyone can produce decent text sitting at their desk, producing images requires either knowing to work with specific software or getting outside and taking good pictures.

Like articles, images can be great content in several ways:

Images that are original, amazingly beautiful, funny, shocking or exclusive can attract a lot of links by their own. Examples of this can be seen everywhere:

  • Bloggers like Hugh Macleod and Punny Money attract a lot of links all the time with their funny fresh comix-like drawings
  • Blogs and sites that publish celebrity snaps also make great content, regardless whether you and me like this.
  • Being on the right place at the right time can lead to taking a newsworthy photo which also is a great linkbait.
  • High quality photos like these on Cazurro make good content too.

Producing images like these requires at least a bit of a talent or journalistic flair. But there is another category of great visual content that everyone who is willing to work hard can produce. This is images that are informative, detailed, scientific, explanatory or instructive. It certainly requires some skills, but nowadays there is enough easy to use software that can help you do this. The harder part will be researching and analyzing the data, unless you are creative and can create something out of nothing. What exactly can be these images?

  • Free or commercial plans for building various stuff. For example this site has over 16,000 house plans.
  • Infographics. Infographics are great and not as hard to create as long as you can find and analyze interesting data. Here is how to create an impressive infographic.
  • Visual guides. Visual guides that explain concepts which is hard to understand are killer content. See for example this great illustrated guide to Matt Cuts comments by Rand Fishkin.
  • All kinds of schemes, diagrams and drawings that explain technical concepts or show step-by-step instructions.
  • Videos. Nowadays a lot of people prefer to watch videos rather than to read. Producing video is not anymore that hard, you only need something which is worth recording. Instructables is a great example how to turn instructional videos into huge link magnets.

In addition to that videos can be used everywhere where images are used, sometimes even with better results.

Images as link bait often work even better when created as resources for other webmasters. Think about Flickr, how many inbound links it has? A quick search in Yahoo with the “linkdomain” command returns 273 million links. Nice, eh? Of course building a site like Flickr isn’t that easy, but you can enjoy a good amount of inbound links by providing:

  • Niche image galleries with Creative Commons Attribution license
  • Free vectors
  • Free clipart
  • High quality paid packages

There are two ways that such content attract links: first webmasters link to it because it’s a good resource. This will happen if your images are good, no matter free or not. Free tends to attract links, but great attracts more and higher quality links – even if it’s not free. The web is full of free stuff, but the great stuff remains scarce.

The second way to gain links is trough the CC “Attribution” License or other license that requires whoever uses your image to link back to the source. This works best with great and free content.

Tools

You probably don’t think about tools as form of content, but essentially they are. Great tools have the same power to attract links, direct traffic and achieve high search engine rankings like the other forms of great content. The key once again is to make tools that are really remarkable. If you build yet another moon phase calendar you will hardly attract links.

Here is what you need to aim for if you want to build a great tool:

  • It should be useful. This is the most important criteria. Wordtracker is useful that’s why there are hundreds of thousands links to it. No matter it’s not free.
  • It should be user friendly. The tools of 37 Signals are user friendly and attract links.
  • It can be free. Being free helps a lot more with tools rather than content. The supply of free tools is much lower than the supply of free articles or free images. But your tool will not attract links just because it’s free. You either need a tool that is better than the other free tools doing similar work or you will need to offer for free something that everyone offers for a fee.

Tools, similar to images, can work also as “widgetbait”. If your tools are great and you allow other webmasters to use them, you can require attribution link showing you as the source. A while ago even stupid tools worked, but today you need to have something really valuable.

Product or Services

Maybe your products or service are not literally “content”, but they may work just like it for attracting links and ranking your site. If your product, service, or customer service is exceptional you will get links to it. It doesn’t need to be free. You don’t need any great articles, tools or images on your site. Think about this:

  • If you are the best dentist in your neighborhood, your site will get links from social networks and personal blogs. No SEO work required!
  • If you are selling the cheapest netbooks online, your site will get links from all over the world.
  • If you are an amazing freelance writer, your site will get links from happy clients even if there is no content on it.
  • If your shopping cart software is the easiest to use, your site will get links.

Of course having content, writing tutorials or offering free tools helps. But if you can offer remarkable service or product, focus on that rather than on writing your blog. Everyone can write blog. Not everyone can be the guru in your niche.

Content can have many different forms and shapes. Don’t write only articles. See what your top competitors are doing to rank better than you. Maybe they have better and more detailed instructional videos. Maybe their blog publishes the funniest articles. Maybe it’s just that their product stands out in a way that can’t be beaten. Or maybe they are giving a lot of free tools and getting quality inbound links for that. Well, they may also rank because of thousands of links from satellite sites, directories and gray-hat tactics :) Then usually you don’t need to worry, follow the “great content” path and you will outrank them soon.

And finally an important note: Often you may think you have produced a great piece of content (article, image, tool, whatever), but it’s only good. If this piece doesn’t attract any links, don’t cross this method over thinking it doesn’t work. Just try next time and make sure you beat your previous effort in quality.

Did I miss an important form of great content?

SEO Myth: Google Likes Blogger Blogs

April 18th, 2010

Status: myth.

I can consider this myth debunked. Google has no preference to Blogger blogs over other blogging platform. You can follow the test:

The start presented the myth and the test conditions.

Then the two blogs were launched and I created a Squidoo lens in attempt to get the blogs indexed.

A week later I figured out that the links from Squidoo lenses are valued very low if they are valued at all. So I created an article and distributed it to 2 low quality article directories.

These links also appeared as worthless at the beginning but a week later and after submitting the two blogs to an RSS directory I finally got them indexed.

The result: the Blogger blog doesn’t rank better. In fact today I have a proof for the opposite. Searching in google for “building dog houses” (with quotes, because the blogs have two low link profile to be found for a search without quotes) is returning the Wordpress blog at page 7. The Blogger blog is nowhere to be found.

As Blogger is quite limited platform, think twice before using them. There is no SEO advantage and there of course shouldn’t be such.

I am ready to start testing the next SEO myth. I have a bunch of ideas on draft but if you have some belief that you want to see tested, send me a comment.

Meanwhile I’ll finally start some slow promotion of this blog as well.

And The Winner Is…

April 17th, 2010

Noone.

My two blogs finally got indexed few days ago. I can now share the URLs:

http://buildingdoghouses.blogspot.com

and

http://buildingdoghouses.wordpress.com

Two blogs, same content, same inbound links.

In the first day I saw them indexed I was ready to announce that Google really prefers Blogger blog. A search in quotes for few words from some of the posts – for example “Do small dogs need dog houses?” was returning the Blogger blog only. The posts from the Worpdress blog were shown only as omitted results.

Well, at the very next day the order was the opposite – the Wordpress posts were shown, the Blogger one – not.

Today when I search for the phrase (or any other phrase from the indexed posts) is returning one link from the Wordpress blog and one from the Blogger blog.

This to me is a clear indicator that Google has no preference to blogs hosted on Blogged. So whoever is saying that is just spreading a myth.

That’s it. This experiment wasn’t very great but it’s good for a start. Now I have two equally ranked blogs ready for next tests. Stay tuned.

Worthless Links: Goarticles, Ideamarketers

April 10th, 2010

This article is part of the series about the myth that Blogger blogs get indexed faster.

Can you believe that – a week after the two articles were submitted to Ideamarketers and Goarticles, neither of the two blogs got even indexed! What could this mean? Most probably it means that the links from Ideamarketers and Goarticles and just plain worthless. Ideamarketers claims that my article is viewed 40 times and Goarticles says 14 times. And even then, nothing is indexed. Think about using low quality article marketing in the future.

Meanwhile the parallel experiment contunues. This blog got all its pages indexed by using only RSS directory submissions. Not that this has brought any traffic, but for me it’s still showing clearly that RSS submissions has a bit more SEO value compared to submitting to low quality article directories. Today I will bring 1 inbound link to this blog from a PR 0, but quality site. Let’s see what kind of effect that may have.

However I have some sites that are getting direct traffic from Ideamarketers so don’t fully neglect this directory.

The Niche, Update and Some Other Info

April 3rd, 2010

I still don’t have the two blogs indexed which is actually the result of another test – whether Squidoo lenses are at all useful. Obviously they are not :) When I search for phrases from my Squidoo lens I find some scraper sites that have scraped it, but not the lens itself.

Mediocre Article Marketing

To speed up a little bit, I decided to do some “article marketing”. I rewrote the lens as an article and published it in Goarticles and Ideamarketers. I can’t publish it on Ezinearticles because they review carefully the submissions and will immediately notice the two links in the signature lead to blogs with exactly the same content. So I needed less quality directories. Hopefully this will help the two blogs to get indexed 8-).

Do RSS Directories Have Any SEO Effect?

Meanwhile I am doing another mini-experiment. I have not done any promotion of this blog, except to publish it in 4-5 RSS directories. There are no other incoming links to the blog as of now. Sumbitting to the RSS directories was enough to get the blog indexed and to get it on first Google page for keyphrases like seo myth breaker and testing seo myths. No one is searching exactly these phrases of course but even this is enough to prove that submitting in RSS directories has some value.

The Key Phrase

Oh and by the way, it’s time to reveal the niche and key phrase both blogs try to rank for – it’s building dog houses. Accordingly to the Adwords tool it has 720 searches monthly – if the competition is proportional to that, this should be low enough to get the blogs ranking somewhere at some moment. But who knows, we’ll see.

SEO Myth: Blogger Blogs Are Indexed Faster and Rank Better (Game Starts)

March 29th, 2010

Ok, I have published the two blogs. Apparently Hubpages has some rule to give you dofollow links only after you have rank above 75, which my fresh account doesn’t, so I decided to create a Squidoo lens linkink to both blogs. Sometimes Squidoo lenses don’t even get indexed, but I’ll give it at least a week before I try next thing (maybe an article on some article directory). I may also submit the blogs to some RSS directories (keeping in mind to always submit the same) but that will happen after publishing the 3 planned micro posts on each of them.

I’ll reveal the target niche/keyphrase in the next post.